![]() ![]() Put out every 5 or 6 year old versions for free. So thank you hackers for putting a little fear into Steinberg so they are forced to come up with good ideas every year to make Cubase better. 5 or whole number so that by the time the software can be cracked, it will be outdated” New policy probably impimented, “we need to put out a major update every year at least a. Panicking: “hurry make a new version, they might crack this one too”Ĭubase 6. “Oh sh*t it wasn’t a fluke, quick make a new version.”Ĭubase 5.5, June 2010 (only one year gap for new version) “Ah, it must of been a fluke, they can’t do it again”Ĭubase 4.5 2008 (two year gap) - steinberg got lazyĬubase 5.0.1 April 2009 (cracked) 3 years since version 4 was out. It could be a coincidence but I like to think the conversation at Steinberg went something like this:Ĭubcame out in less than one year. ![]() This is good because it forces them to come up with better workflow ideas for us. I made a humerous timeline from Wikipedia Cubase release dates and which ones were cracked to show how it made them update Cubase more often. So Steinberg simply makes a new full version every two years and a 0.5 update every year. The hackers that cracked the elicenser/Steinberg key the first time admitted that it took them 2 years to crack it. Fear of Cubase being cracked is one of the reasons Cubase is so good. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |